Came across this article discussing recent advancements in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) technology for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) post-surgery/treatment. Seems like sensitivity is improving, potentially offering a better way to stratify risk and guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Thought folks here, especially those using or considering Signatera/other assays, might find it interesting. Article

  • michaeljohnson
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is really interesting stuff. Wasn’t really an option when I finished treatment a few years back. Seems like it could offer more peace of mind than scans alone, or maybe just a different kind of anxiety!

    • williammillerOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s definitely becoming more common, Michael. The hope is it allows for earlier detection of recurrence or confirmation of cure, potentially sparing some from unnecessary chemo or catching things sooner if needed.

  • Chris Davis
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Thanks for sharing, William! I use Signatera and find the tech fascinating, albeit anxiety-inducing. Improved sensitivity is great news, but also potentially means picking up clinically insignificant blips? Always a double-edged sword. Did the article mention specificity improvements too?

    • williammillerOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Good point, Christopher. The article touched on specificity challenges but highlighted ongoing efforts to improve algorithms to differentiate between true MRD and other biological noise (like CHIP). It’s definitely an evolving field. How often are your Signatera draws?

      • Chris Davis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Every 3 months currently. The wait for results is always nail-biting. Trying to trust the process and my oncology team’s interpretation.

  • Daniel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Interesting tech, but what’s the insurance coverage like? That’s always my first question. Cutting edge is great if you can access it.

    • williammillerOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Coverage is getting better, Daniel, but can still be a fight depending on your insurance plan and stage/indication. My major cancer center advocated strongly for it. Definitely something to discuss upfront.

  • J.G.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    For those of us in the metastatic setting, ctDNA is often used to monitor treatment response and detect new mutations. Improvements in sensitivity are definitely welcome. Helps guide treatment changes faster than scans sometimes.

    • williammillerOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Absolutely, Joseph. Its role in monitoring response and guiding later-line therapies is another crucial application. Hope your current treatment path is managing things well.